Rant: Have We Got This Poker Sponsorship Thing All Wrong?

Luke Schwartz Sandwich EPT London
Let them eat sandwiches.

Have we gotten this poker-pro sponsorship thing all wrong?

Are we sponsoring the wrong people?

And are we using these people to attract the wrong sort of clientele?

I think we are.

More High-Risk Takers Needed

I have a strong view that the reason we're not seeing the consistent flow of numbers that the game once enjoyed is because everyone is running out of money.

Michael Phelps
Can you imagine Phelps saying no to the Olympics?
 

You need money to play this game and that was never better demonstrated than when Daniel Negreanu suggested a format for poker to be included as an Olympic sport and created a prize pool.

Can you imagine Michael Phelps turning down the chance to swim for his country because there's not enough money available to the winner?

The reason people are running out of money is because the recreational player mass we are attracting is not in the stratum of high-risk takers. Instead, we are attracting low risk takers.

Players who won’t use their credit cards, won’t lie to their wives, won’t beg, steal and borrow, and won’t take the Children’s Book Club money.

So why does this happen?

One of the reasons is the "goody-two-shoes" approach in recent years to the appointments of professionally sponsored poker players. And even when someone makes the cut who is willing to cause a bit of controversy, the lines are missing from the script.

Why Are We Afraid of Controversy?

There is a school of thought that controversy damages the brand of a respected poker organization but we have to get real here.

We might kid ourselves that we're in the genre of entertainment but in truth when you walk into the library of life we are filed somewhere between sex, deceit and debauchery.

We are more Wolf of Wall Street than Three Little Pigs. So what exactly are we afraid of?

I’m not talking about allowing everyone to run amok by cheating, stealing and rule breaking. I'm talking about introducing characters into the game that will make your toenails curl.

David Ulliott
Enjoys a bit of mischief here and there.
 

The type whose words cause scarring of the mind. The ones who make you cringe and laugh in equal volume.

Paddy Power are a case in point. The Irish funsters have a position known as Head of Mischief and its Global Marketing Director, Christian Woolfenden, recently told the press that: ‘We’re disappointed if we don’t get any complaints.”

It recently decided to sponsor former NBA legend Dennis Rodman’s controversial trip to North Korea, sent Rodman around the Vatican in a Popemobile to promote the quest for a black pope, and opened a market for murder when it allowed punters to bet on the outcome of the Oscar Pistorious trial.

Grown-Ups Who Like a Bit of Mischief

Shock, horror, disaster!

The profits must be plummeting, the sky must be falling and the company must be falling off the edge of a cliff.

Not on your nelly.

This company is on the up and up. It's the most innovative gang on the street corner and, slowly but surely, its competitors are starting to stand next to them in the corridors of the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) as they wait to have their bums smacked.

Because people who gamble at Paddy Power are grown-ups who like a bit of mischief. They are risk takers.

The type of people who sit next to Fixed Odds Betting Terminals (FOBTs) chucking in their weekly wages because they have a dream to do this rather than empty people’s bins for a living.

Paddy Power understand (a) who the audience is and (b) the type of audience it wants to attract.

The Irish troublemakers want to attract troublemakers. People who will do whatever it takes to find a few pennies to have a bet, and the poker industry should be the same.

The Naughty School of Poker

I want someone to rise up against the established poker organizations and create a new brand, and I want its mission statement to be naughty not nice.

Mike Matusow
Matusow: Undeniably one of the most popular players ever
 

I want to see the likes of Luke "Full_Flush" Schwartz, Tony G, Dave "The Devilfish" Ulliot, Roberto Romanello, Kim Shannon, Mike "The Mouth" Matusow and Matthew Marafioti hired as sponsored pros.

I want their roles and responsibility statements to enable them to push the game to its limits, supported by the brand itself also creating even more innovative ways to create mischief, mayhem and madness.

It’s time to start re-evaluating who we want sitting at our tables. The swots or the vagabonds?

You May Also Like

assets/photos/_resampled/croppedimage12580-IMG2790.JPG

Daily 3-Bet: T-Shirt Tempest, Atruism Groundswell, Battle for SNL

The PokerListings Daily 3-Bet is a lopsided rasta hat, a Guatemalan poncho and nothing but embarrassing headshakes on the afternoon poker news livestream.

22 August 2014
assets/photos/_resampled/croppedimage12580-IMG3544.JPG

Daily 3-Bet: Jungle Hit, Drop-Dead Chess, Best EPT Moment Ever

The PokerListings Daily 3-Bet is a rivered one-outer, a repeat trip to the winner's circle and one entirely unforgettable afternoon poker news moment.

21 August 2014
assets/photos/_resampled/croppedimage12580-IMG1659.jpg

Negreanu: "You Can't Be For and Against the Game at Same Time"

Say nothing. Do nothing. Be nothing. That's just not how Daniel Negreanu rolls.

21 August 2014 2
assets/photos/_resampled/croppedimage12580-colmanbusquetTs.png

Daily 3-Bet: Colman Backs Palestine, Timex Profits, Poker v Kickball

The PokerListings Daily 3-Bet is a pair of light-up shoes, a rubber utility ball and 20 mins of off-the-hook, heart-pounding afternoon poker news four-square.

20 August 2014 1

Please fill the required fields correctly!

Error saving comment!

You need to wait 3 minutes before posting another comment.

Comment added. Thank you!

Hank 2014-03-03 21:01:00

@DK 1 well put

DK 2014-03-03 17:30:17

In response to Onolycreu:
He's not saying that the well-deserved pros shouldn't have their sponsorships, rather, he's suggesting the trouble makers, the ones who draw attraction and drama to the game through their antics, ought to be sponsored as well as they will hopefully recreate a buzz that existed in the poker world only half a decade ago. Without the attraction from amateur players, the game does not exist and your "respectable, hard working player," will likely be out of a job as their only be playing amongst themselves.

Lee Davy 2014-03-03 14:57:51

Onolycreu, I don't remember saying they were deserving of it. Perhaps, you got yourself in such a knot over the direction of the content that you forgot to read it properly?

Onolycreu 2014-03-03 12:34:51

So essentially you're saying that immature assholes and absolute scumbags are more deserving of sponsorship than all of the respectable, hard-working players who are immensely passionate about this game and have dedicated their lives to it. This has to be one of the dumbest posts you've ever written.
Go #$%@ yourself.
Sincerely,
Everyone who's not completely braindead