# Variance and Poker Pt. 1: How Good Cash-Game Players Outrun Luck

Very good live cash-game players will always be stacking chips.

Variance in poker – what’s that, who needs it and why is it important?

In this two-part series PokerOlymp's Arved Klöhn explains what variance is and how it dictates your poker results.

First he'll take a look at variance in live poker and then he'll compare live poker variance to online poker.

By Arved Klöhn

Variance isn't a dirty word per se, but for most of us it’s a very theoretical term and only few of us understand what it actually means.

Let's call him John.

Variance has a lot to do with mathematics, which – again – is not a dirty word but a science that makes sure our cars drive, our planes fly and our smart phones are smart (to some extent at least).

To understand what variance means one does not have to study probability theory or know that the abbreviation CLT means “Central Limit Theorem."

It’s actually a lot simpler than that. Basically in poker, variance is a term (or more specifically a number) which describes how far your results spread around the mean.

To put it simpler – a lot of variance means many swings; less variance means fewer swings.

But let’s look at an example to get a better grasp at the concept of variance in poker and put some numbers on it.

### Variance for Live Poker Players

Let's take a look at a decent low-stakes live poker player. We'll call him John.

John plays \$1/\$2 No-Limit Hold’em in his local casino. He plays 20 days per month and averages six hours of play per day.

He usually plays between 30 and 35 hands per hour. Thus in total he plays about 4,000 hands per month.

Now since John is a decent player he usually wins at his game. Per month he averages \$2,000 profit after rake and tips. So his win rate is \$50 per 100 hands.

Of course John doesn’t win uniformly every day. He has good days where he wins a ton and bad days where he loses quite a bit. “Good days and bad days” – that’s his variance.

Now let’s try to put a number on John’s variance. Therefore we ask him for one month to accurately write down his results every 100 hands.

So John produces this chart for us:

 \$50 \$180 \$0 \$160 -\$190 \$140 \$440 -\$200 -\$300 \$230 \$230 \$320 \$130 \$390 \$330 \$340 \$200 -\$220 \$130 \$640 -\$170 \$90 -\$50 -\$120 -\$270 -\$200 -\$260 \$20 \$90 -\$160 \$0 -\$340 \$190 -\$250 \$120 -\$300 \$400 \$90 \$200 -\$80

Those are John’s winnings for each 100-hand-stretch. If you add up those 40 numbers it’s exactly \$2,000. But for individual stretches his results range from \$340 losses to \$640 wins.

On average we expect John to win \$50 per 100 hands, but let’s take a closer look at his variance.

Therefore we calculate the average difference from his expected winnings (\$50 per 100 hands) for all forty 100-hand-stretches (a program like excel comes in quite handy here because it has built in formulas to do those calculations).

We did this calculation and it turns out the average difference is \$238. This number is called standard deviation.

This means John will miss his expected winnings of \$50 per 100 hands by \$238 on average – either by winning way more than \$50 or by losing over a single 100-hand-stretch.

### The 3 Magic Numbers for Variance

Now we've gathered the three important numbers to fully understand variance:

The kind of thing John will avoid.

1. Win Rate: In the case of John: \$50 per 100 hands
2. Standard Deviation: In the case of John: \$238 per 100 hands
3. Number of Hands Played: In the case of John: 4,000 (for one month)

Those three numbers are all we need to run a bunch of tests, explain John’s results over long periods and even make educated guesses about his future winnings.

We take those three parameters (win rate, standard deviation and number of hands) and head to over to any variance calculator to get some more insight into the variance John can expect.

Pokerdope.com probably hosts the best free available variance calculator for poker players. So let’s go there, enter those three parameters and take a look at the results (this calculator works with big blinds instead of dollars so we translated John’s numbers to big blinds):

Now what do we see here? Firstly the calculator shows 20 simulated samples how John might perform over the course of one month (the thin colored lines).

It also shows the best and worst run out of 1,000 trials (the bold blue and red lines).

The bold green lines show the confidence intervals. The two dark green lines are the most important ones – they indicate the 95-per cent confidence interval.

"John" may expect some wild rides over just one month.

This term means that in 95 per cent of all cases the actual results will be somewhere between those lines. Meaning: at any given time there’s only a 5 per cent chance that his winnings will be above the upper dark green graph or below the lower dark green graph.

Let’s take a closer look at some numbers the variance calculator produces:

• The probability that John does not make any profit over 4,000 hands is 9.2 per cent.
• 5 per cent of the time John will be stuck in a downswing over more than \$2,000 (1,000 big blinds).
• 3 to 4 per cent of the time John will be stuck in a downswing over more than 10,000 hands (that’s two-and-a-half months if he plays 4,000 hands per month).
• On average John can expect to win \$2,000 per month but there’s a 5 per cent chance that he will either win more than \$5,000 in one month or lose at least \$1,000 in one month.

To put those numbers into a single, simple sentence: John may expect some wild rides and should not be too surprised if he has a losing month and should not boast excessively if he has a very good month.

Now what happens to his variance if John plays more than just one month?

Naturally one would expect the variance to have a lesser impact when playing more. So let’s assume John plays for 10 months (40,000 hands) with the same win rate (\$50 or 25 big blinds per 100 hands) and the same standard deviation (\$238 or 119 big blinds per 100 hands).

Here's what the variance calculator shows:

Now those lines look much friendlier – all of them go up. And even the worst run out of 1,000 trials is way above the zero line. In fact, let’s take a closer look at some numbers:

• The probability of John losing money over 40,000 hands (10 months worth of live poker) is miniscule: 0.001 per cent.
• In 95 per cent of all trials John will win between \$10,400 and \$29,500 over 10 months.

Those numbers lead to one conclusion:

Good cash-game players don't sweat variance.

• Very good live cash game players have no variance problems

The example we just went through shows that after a few months of play a good live cash-game player can expect to simply outlast any negative variance he might encounter along the way.

If you’re good enough and your win rate is high enough, you will come off well despite any downswing you might stumble into.

But the example also shows that over short periods of time you must take variance into consideration. In our example there’s a very realistic chance of having a losing month (9.2 per cent).

So you should always make sure your bankroll can handle those short-term swings.

19 December 2017

8 November 2017

### When to Fire a Second Barrel on the Turn: A Simple Guide

27 September 2017

### A Noob's Guide to 8-Game: Learn 8 Poker Games, Crush Them

5 September 2017

Error saving comment!

You need to wait 3 minutes before posting another comment.

Graham Clarke 2017-02-14 14:49:47

i need to find out more about this and the triggers seem to be continually bad before the good hand is about to get busted, this is in tournaments, sod playing cash games online these days

ultimatecurse 2017-02-14 02:18:01

they are going to make decentralized rng for ethereum eco system for poker. Where you can play and players or the company will not be able to mess with or hack it or set it a certain way to trigger bad beats etc. Right now the rngs are centralized easily hackable and can be set in certain patterns. Even the california lottery rng was hacked by a guy that won the lottery. He figured out how to beat it. I can't find it but there was an article that tested rng for a poker site and found very odd findings with players and how the card pattern was coming out where they were sure the rng had been tampered with. And they used engineers and scientist type people to do research on it.

You can also look up potripper for absolute poker. It shows how they can rig the rng to see the cards cause its centralized and rng is very easily manipulated. Its just example of how easy it is to mess with it and its obviously going on in poker but absolute was the only one that got caught for sending out hand history by accident to a complaining customer. Or they would of never been caught.

Graham Clarke 2017-02-13 17:28:27

I have noticed the pattern and the triggers, and when rng is going to kill you on every hand you bet with the bad triggers and not get the good trigger is depressing, I first thought it was bug's in the software and complained to the poker site, now can't get anywhere, looks like i should of kept my mouth shut,

Kar Yung Tom 2016-05-12 15:20:08

Really?

Manolis Kontis 2016-02-24 19:10:10

Could you please explain what is that pattern? Send me pm!

BananaMan 2016-01-18 19:55:20

Only issue with this particular discussion and many other variance articles is that they assume the player's game approach and competition is constant throughout the sample. However, this is one of the classic mistakes people make it measuring true win rate. I don't believe true win rate exists in a game that is so ever changing because it is likely that the environment will change immensely by the time a large sample is reached. I can reference a friend who played over 2M hands online in the same game for years and believed his winrate was super accurate, only to experience a much different result over the next 2M hands.

ultimatecurse 2016-01-06 15:42:37

variance can make you lose for years not just months even with the best in the world. Artilces like these are not realistic gives new grinders a bad idea of how it works. Only half a percent in the whole world can profit grinding poker daily not even 1 percent. And about 30% are cent and probably 5% are world class and 4.5% of those wont profit. Doesn't matter how well you play i have gone for months losing with the 2nd nuts over and over again and losing all in pre with AA Kk several times having opponents dominated.Tons of set over sets flush vs flush etc. So you have to learn to beat the rng not just the players to profit at poker. It took me a few years to figure out but their is a pattern to it that trigger it to do certain things so you can avoid a lot of the bad variance if you can figure out the pattern to it. I wont say what it is but their is a pattern. Thats how you see some of these guys 24 tabling beatings the games they figured out how to beat the rng their not necessarily good players.

Derek Dishart 2015-07-31 01:45:58

Professionals win a lot more than 4bb/100 live. Recreational gamblers don't drive an hour to the casino to fold cards.

Jose 2015-01-27 20:01:06

nobody wins 25bb/100. the example is not realistic. people grind it out with 3 or 4bb/100 online. why should it be that higher playing live.

Best Poker Sites - Editor`s Pick
Poker Site Ranking Bonus
1 Free Money Poker \$1,000 Review
• ### How Poker Got Its Bad Name: Sol Smith & the Steamboat Hustle

You know how poker keeps trying to get rid of its reputation of being a...
26 September 2017
• ### Beyond the Poker Table: Off the Beaten Path in Barcelona

For over a decade poker players have journeyed to Barcelona to play PokerStars events. It’s undoubtedly...
25 August 2017
• See More Blog Posts »
• ### Battle of Malta 2017: Nadav Lipszyc wins final table, takes home €200,000 prize

8 November 2017 39
• ### Poker Action and Side Events on Battle of Malta Day 3

6 November 2017 121
×

Sorry, this room is not available in your country.

Please try the best alternative which is available for your location:

Close and visit page