# Playing Hands With Showdown Value

Lots of players fail to recognize when hands have showdown value.

They consistently flush money down the drain betting and raising when instead they should be taking a showdown line.

When your hand has showdown value your equity comes from getting all the way to showdown and winning.

So making it to showdown (cheaply) should be your number one goal.

Recognizing Showdown Value When You See It

A hand with showdown value is essentially a hand that's not quite strong enough to bet for value but strong enough to expect to win at showdown more often than not.

But like anything in poker, the answer to the question "Which hands have showdown value?" is "It depends."

It depends on the board texture, the action, your opponent, your table image and, well, in short, it depends on everything.

The golden rule of a hand with showdown value is that it's strong enough to win at showdown but not strong enough to bet for value.

In other words, the "A worse hand never calls and a better hand never folds" adage applies again.

If I bet, is there a worse hand that will call?

An Example:

You have J J. You raise to \$6 on the button and the big blind calls.

The flop comes A 3 2. He checks and you bet \$10.

He calls. The turn comes K. He checks and you check behind.

The river comes Q and he checks.

Start out by asking yourself, "If I bet this river, will my opponent call with a worse hand?"

In this example, it's a pretty clear NO.

Ok, now what about if you check? Is there a chance your jacks are good?

Absolutely. If your opponent had any sort of draw or a pocket pair worse than yours on the flop, you almost surely have the best hand.

Check and take that free showdown because there's no value in betting.

The value your jacks have seeing a free showdown far outweighs both betting for value or betting as a bluff.

A Trickier Example:

You have 7 8. You raise to \$8 in the cut-off and the big blind calls.

The flop comes 4 J 3.

He checks and you c-bet \$12. He calls. The turn comes 8 and he checks.

What should you do?

On the flop, you made a continuation-bet. At this point, your hand has no showdown value and the only equity you have is the fold equity you get by betting.

You want your opponent to fold. That's the only way you can win.

Once the turn falls, though, everything changes.

Sometimes barreling the turn is pointless.

All of a sudden you have a pair of eights and, well, showdown value. The bulk of your equity in the pot is no longer fold equity because you have a pair.

But should you bet it? No.

Rarely, if ever, is a thinking player going to call with a worse hand. And he certainly isn't going to fold a better hand.

So we check with the intention of seeing a showdown.

Barreling Doesn't Make Poker Sense

This example is a good one because lots of players will just barrel this turn 100% of the time, but that makes no poker sense.

Barreling this turn is pointless.

The only way you make money is if your opponent folds. And if your opponent folds, you had the best hand anyway.

Barreling this turn would only be profitable if your opponent was especially weak and would either call two streets with a draw or, on the other end of the spectrum, fold a jack to a second barrel.

Both of which are very unlikely.

The only thing barreling this turn accomplishes is building a bigger pot with you as the underdog.

Once you turn that hand with showdown value, your plans change. No longer is your equity in the hand from getting your opponent to fold.

Your goal now becomes getting to showdown to see if you're good vs. his flop-peeling range.

Put Your Opponent on a Range

Whenever you make a decision in poker, the most important factor is what your opponent has.

Your opponent's range dictates what your most +EV decision is in every single hand you will ever play.

Putting your opponent on a range is an imprecise art. You slowly remove hands from his range as the hand progresses until you're left with a small range of his likely holdings.

Put your opponent on a range.

If you can narrow down his holdings even a little bit, you'll be better able to suit your play to his.

Example:

Take the 4 J 3 example above.

When he peels the flop, we can put him on a range of jacks, flush draws, straight draws and 55-99. Sets and overpairs can be discounted.

When you turn the eight and are deciding whether or not to bet, you have to look at his calling range.

If he folds all draws and continues with 99+, his calling range has you crushed and your bet accomplishes nothing.

If, however, he calls with worse than a pair of eights, then the bet is fine.

The same goes for if he folds better. If he for some reason folds a jack to your second barrel, your bet is perfectly fine as well because it actually accomplishes something.

The problem with an inbetween hand like eights in this example is there aren't many hands worse than yours that would be willing to call the turn bet.

Meaning we would just fold out the hands we were already ahead of.

There's no value in betting there.

The best play is to check behind and play poker on the river, hoping to see a free or cheap showdown.

Ask yourself a few simple questions.

It's a very fine line sometimes, choosing whether the best play is betting for value, betting as a bluff or trying to see a cheap showdown.

But do your best to put your opponent on a range and ask yourself a few simple questions.

• Where does my equity in this hand come from?
• Is he going to call with worse?
• Is he going to fold better?
• Is there a chance I can win this at showdown?

Once you know where your value comes from you can act accordingly.

There's nothing wrong with being aggressive, but it needs to be controlled aggression. Playing hands with good showdown value aggressively, looking for a fold, just isn't profitable.

It will end up costing you far more money than if you just try to see cheap showdowns with them.

Keep your aggression reigned in. Use it when the only way you can win is getting your opponent to fold, or when you're betting for value.

If you can remember all that, and successfully put it into practice, you should immediately see better results with those inbetween, middle-pair type hands.

More strategy articles:

### When to Fire a Second Barrel on the Turn: A Simple Guide

27 September 2017

5 September 2017

23 May 2017

### Daniel Negreanu’s 7 Golden Rules for Poker Beginners

9 May 2017 2

Error saving comment!

You need to wait 3 minutes before posting another comment.

Eric 2010-07-03 08:39:41

Just to double check, is the reason you would bet in Thomas's example because based on the information you have at the time, you have a good chance of having the best hand, and there are 2 cards left to decrease the value of your hand, while in the example from the article where you hit the 8 on the turn, you already know the oppo called the flop, so you know he would probably have something better than pair 8's, and there is only 1 card left to see that could weaken your hand (vs the 2 from the flop)?

BalintS 2010-03-09 19:48:30

But for stealing the pot then give it up for any call or raise, you don't need any showdown value, do you? You can only win (when called) if it gets checked all the way down to showdown, and your opponent doesn't fight back on any streets. The two remaining streets ruin your hand nearly as often as they would give you new showdown value holding some air highcards or weak draw. I guess having a good position for this stealing manouevre is more important than having some midpair-like weak showdown value (against multiple opponents).

Sean Lind 2010-02-01 20:38:43

Thomas,

Poker is situational, but the majority of the time in that situation you will have the best hand. If you're playing against players who will fold, then you should always be betting there.

Just know that some players will have a better hand (and call), some player will have a worse hand (and call or raise) and some players may have a draw (and call or raise).

You're goal here is not to build a pot, but to steal the small one while you have the best hand. Don't commit yourself to this pot in any way, but it's -EV to simply give up on it.

Just beware of wet boards. If there are three to a straight with two two a suit, chances are someone has a draw, so it might be best to just let that one go.

Thomas 2010-01-30 03:58:08

So When you flop middle or even top pair with a weak kicker in a limp multi way pot you should be betting? if it gets checked to you, to narrow the field?

Sean Lind 2009-07-23 20:25:00

Aaron,

With every additional card that comes, the value of your hand is lowered. For example, holding 78 on the flop A82 has you sitting with a decent chance at having the best hand.

If you let the board fill out to A82JQ, your hand is no longer looking very strong.

It is better to take the pot down now, than to wait. Just expect to run into players holding an Ace here from time to time. If anyone calls or raises, you need to shut down, or go away.

Aaron 2009-07-23 08:32:00

A situation I run into often is flopping middle pair. At the levels I play I see a lot of limped pots which I will join with suited connectors. Then I hit middle pair and take a stab at it because nobody shows any aggression preflop or postflop for those who act before me. (assuming I'm in middle position). Lets say I have 78s. flop A82. Checks to me. Should I bet hoping to make those with KQ etc. fold so they can't hit? Betting here is often worked for me to take it down right here but I want to know if I am giving up my showdown value. When I win these I often feel I had the best hand anyway but prevented anyone else from making a better one. Thoughts?

Daniel Skolovy 2009-06-23 03:16:00

Andy you are correct. It was a mistake and I've removed it.

Andy Karr 2009-06-19 19:34:00

Sorry if I seem stupid, but why do you put this villain on A6s if he peels the flop? Why the six? Wouldn't many also peel it with A7, A8, etc...???

Brent 2009-06-18 21:52:00

Thank you for the article. I read it right after making the mistake of betting in that position and ruining myself in a tourney.

Dr_Woohoo 2009-06-18 03:01:00

Thank you for this article. It hones in on a serious weakness in my game, and has been very helpful. Seans comments clarified well.

Best Poker Sites - Editor`s Pick
Poker Site Ranking Bonus
1 Free Money Poker \$1,000 Review
• ### How Poker Got Its Bad Name: Sol Smith & the Steamboat Hustle

You know how poker keeps trying to get rid of its reputation of being a...
26 September 2017
• ### Beyond the Poker Table: Off the Beaten Path in Barcelona

For over a decade poker players have journeyed to Barcelona to play PokerStars events. It’s undoubtedly...
25 August 2017
• See More Blog Posts »
• ### Battle of Malta 2017: Nadav Lipszyc wins final table, takes home €200,000 prize

8 November 2017 39
• ### Poker Action and Side Events on Battle of Malta Day 3

6 November 2017 121
×

Sorry, this room is not available in your country.