Loading...Online Bonus
Ace-Queen Part 3: Some Ideas on Play
By Sean Lind
The final installment of a three-part article. After all the talk of where A-Q stacks up according to the numbers, we can now make decisions on how to play it.
The Middle Hand
As explained in other articles, such as Big Hand, Small Pot Part 2: The Middle Hand, it never makes sense to bet the middle hand.
This is an example of that sort of scenario. A-Q is a high-middle in the world of playable hands, but it's still in the middle nonetheless.
Players new to poker are quick to pick up that A-Q is a top 5% hand, and feel that that number alone should make it a profitable play.
But without the necessary skill, experience and ability to read other players, playing A-Q in early position - or for very new beginners, even playing A-Qo at all - can be a losing play.
Players such as Daniel Negreanu have openly talked about A-Q losing them money long-term and being a trouble hand. But that doesn't mean they won't play it.
Being a top 5% hand, it is statistically profitable, but only if you can dump it when you run into the lose-money scenarios.
Forget ace-queen; what about ace-Gene?
How to Play A-Q
I started writing this article to try and hammer out some good ideas and guidelines on how to play the hand.
Unfortunately, I don't think it's possible to explain in print. From everything I've explained in this article, it becomes clear that to play A-Q profitably, it's a purely situational hand.
You have to play it differently, or not at all, depending on the table you're on and the players you're with.
If you're up against nine players who will only play top-five hands, A-Q is a losing hand. If you're up against players who will play any two cards, the numbers will back up A-Q to make you money.
How you play A-Q on Titan Poker may be completely different to how you would play A-Q on PokerStars.
No matter how you play it, you need to be making information plays. You need some way to get a solid read on what you're up against. It's better to lose two bets pre-flop, or on the flop, than to lose eight bets across five streets.
Early Position
In my first year of poker I quickly noticed A-Q as being a trouble hand for me, and began to experiment with different ways of playing it.
One of the ways I experimented was to limp-reraise A-Q from early position. If your No. 1 goal is to gain information about the other hands, this can be a great way to do it at a low-medium limit No-Limit table.
With the amount of strength shown by a limp reraise, you can be sure the other player has a hand that dominates you if they call or come back over the top. In these scenarios you lose three bets, compared to losing one where you miss or a stack when you hit a setup flop.
One thing to remember with this play, and any information play, is the motives you had for making the play in the first place.
If the person does call you after making the limp reraise, you have to sign right off and be willing to dump the hand no matter what the flop (other than flopping broadway).
Even flopping top two in this scenario will put you at risk of losing your stack against two of the top-five hands, winning nearly nothing against KK and winning small to a stack against A-K.
Remember, with the strength you showed pre-flop, A-K will be less likely to pay you out on an A-Q-2 board. Chances of you having AA or QQ are very real, making it a hard call for them to make.
Making this move is only a good idea against ABC players. ABC players will react to this move exactly in line with the strength of the hand they're holding.
If you attempt this move against tricky players, you can put yourself into poor spots. For example, if you make this move against a player known to raise, bet, call and three-bet light, you will gain no information going to the flop.
You have now built a statistically very large pre-flop heads up pot, with no information in the hand. This makes post-flop decisions very difficult.
Against such a player, if you think hitting your ace or queen is good, the size of the pot will dictate how much it will sting if you're wrong.
Sometimes, the best choice is just to fold.
Late Position
As in all other aspects of poker, the single most important factor next to the strength of your hand is playing your position.
In late position, I would advocate raising an unopened pot with A-Q almost every time. It is a top 5% hand, and if no one is showing strength, it is most likely best.
If you are behind a raiser, it has to be a read-based play. Against anyone resembling a tight player, it wouldn't be a mistake to muck the hand.
Even if the raiser is a nutbar, you have to remember that even nutbars get dealt monster hands, and they will be raising those just like all the rest.
Playing A-Q in a raised pot is a purely read-based scenario. If you're at a table where you are outmatched, A-Q is better left in the muck, than in your hand.
Even though I would advocate limp-reraising with A-Q in certain situations, I would rarely, if ever, encourage reraising from late position with it. Your reraise is going to force everyone else in the hand to fold to the original raiser, isolating them and you.
Good players here can smooth-call virtually any hand to either set a trap, set up a bluff, or try to crack you. You won't gain enough information from a good player in this scenario to make it a valuable play.
I don't like to have to count on luck to make my hand profitable. Smooth-calling a raise is obviously a poor option. You have no information on the hand by making this move, and are putting yourself into the exact scenarios I listed earlier. Those ended as -EV.
I feel that A-Q is better mucked behind a raise without having a serious read on the other players at the table. If you're able to read them blind, then having A-Q is irrelevant, as your cards no longer matter.
Afterthoughts
A-Q is by far the biggest trouble hand in poker. For this reason alone, unless you have a good reason, and a good spot to play it, it's best left mucked.
I would be interested to get your feedback on this article, and your thoughts on A-Q. If you have any comments to make, questions or whatnot, post comments on this page, or jump into our forum.
More strategy articles from Sean Lind:
Comment(s) on this article
Ray Pickard May 18, 2008
Thanks. I have started playing AQ only on button in unraised pots and small/big blinds.Has turned me from a loser to a winner.
Sean Lind May 21, 2008
I'm glad to hear it Ray. But remember, AQ is a top 10 hand. As your poker skill improves you can get more liberal with it.
But I still say err on the side of caution. If players such as Brunson and Negreanu can have problems with it, anyone can. Basically, play it very similar, if not exactly, as you would A-10.
Too many players play it like AK... good for us, bad for them.
andrew99 Jun 4, 2008
I have continously won 5 successive events .thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-------------------------
adam
http://www.widecircles.com
81 EAGLE Jun 23, 2008
very good.
I´ve beeng making the mistake of playing AQ as a top 10 hand and after 120k hands it is still a losing hand for me
Sean Lind Jul 30, 2008
Actually that picture was a mistake as it was supposed to be a shot of Negreanu. It's been fixed, thanks for pointing that out.
Taylor Aug 14, 2008
Hey
Great article I've been trying to find an something published about ace queen for a while. Ace Queen isn't my problem, but I seem to be cutting my profits short and losing big pots with ace king suited or non. Is there an article or something that you suggest reading about maximizing hands and cutting loses with ace king? Or do you have any suggestions.
Jay C Sep 8, 2008
great article, i specially like the references to how your table is, because i keep getting AQs and playing it against maniacs to try and get some value and most of the times i end up losing most of my stack (in stgo's). Against abc players is an auto-fold for me, though you can't negate that is a tempting hand.
John R Jan 15, 2009
I regard myself as a tight player and I think AQ is a great hand on a non tight table especially if I am the initial raiser. I'm usually only raising AA, KK, QQ, JJ, AK or AQ. What this means is that in effect I get AK and AQ more than any other of these hands. My goal with AQ is usually to raise it up and then take the pot down with a cbet. I rarely fire 2 barrels with AQ unless I hit top pair top kicker and feel confident my opponent is not slow playing AA or KK.
I believe one of the keys to being able to play AK and AQ well is to be seen raising with AA or KK and then betting every street for value. Once people have seen you do this once you can start to double barrel with AK in particular and it becomes hard for thinking players to call you down even with JJ. Most players are reraising preflop with QQ, KK or AA.
I even don't mind having to fold AQ by giving up on the turn or giving up to a raise pref-flop or on the flop. This rounds out my game and helps to get action when I have AA, KK because weak players often start to assume they can push me off a hand.
leiito Apr 10, 2009
The article makes some good points but I'm still pretty sure that playing AQ on the button and from blinds only is taking it too far.
My tracker stats showed AQo making profit slightly less than 99 and more than 88.
In loose full ring limit games you get a action from suited aces and all pairs and you do make money when you flop an ace and outkick your opponent and when you flop a queen and opponents call you down with lower paid. Obviously this tend to be mid sized pots and you have to be willing to let go of the hand when raised on the turn by a tight player.
In NL the hand is even trickier and while I wouldn't avoid playing it there's something to say for limping from early position, again for situations when you share top pair, ace or queen, with an opponent, but this scenario applies to passive opponents who will call you down rather than try and make a move.
In middle and late position I'll keep going after the blinds with AQ, pretty much as I'd do with, say, 88.
Suited vs. offsuit, mathematically the strength of a hand is only marginally higher if suited but for most players a suited ace has a special appeal and even in tight NL games you see people limping a lot and even calling raises with suited aces, to their detriment obviously since you flop a flush very rarely and when you do it's hard to get paid off, while a good player will know to price you out of a draw. A standard "strong" play against this is to push with a nut flush draw, but I prefer to do this on the turn since you're more likely to get credit for a set there, both in limit or NL.
tino May 28, 2009
Loved the article and it will certainly make me more aware when playing A-Q in future. But the biggest problem hand for me has always been A-J. That hand has cost me more times than enough and now i hardly ever play it. Its almost like a curse on me. So how about a decent article on A-J, that would benefit me to a larger extent than this one will.
A very enjoyable read though, thanks.
nate Jun 18, 2009
If I have AQo, I limp UTG, everyone folds to the big blind (loose agressive) and he raises, should I re-raise or smooth call?
Sean Lind Jun 18, 2009
Nate,
As with many poker questions, the answer here is really "it depends".
It has to come down to ranges and stack sizes. Since it's only you two, and the pot is almost nothing, he can't be raising to steal.
Put him on a range, and play it from there. I would generally re-raise in this spot, you have position, you have a decent chance at having the best hand, and you want to take control of the hand.
Ray Ilas Jul 19, 2009
i read this article about 20 minutes after i lost with the A-Q to a set(on the river). i was short stacked in middle position and went in for 9k on 2.5/6k blinds. other player has nerve to call 9k pre-flop. flop shows an A-4-J. then she goes all in for 5k and shows 6-6. i thought to myself 14k with a pair of 6's. i forget the turn, but the river is another 6.
I played it just like the article said but, that's what you get when you play with people in free poker
Leave a comment