Andy Black
Not everyone has Buddhism to fall back on.

Bob Silverstein is a psychotherapist who also plays poker (or is that a poker player who also does therapy?) He's written, interestingly, on what he calls "internal tells" --- emotional states that compromise or interfere with decision making at the table.

It's a funny term and he lists a wide range of circumstances as marking an "internal tell".

These include high levels of tension when under pressure (tough hand, lot of money at stake), feelings of unease because of other events in one's life (family matters, business problems), individual differences in the ability to control and regulate emotions and, of course, Hellmuthian tantrums and Matusowian meltdowns.

Silverstein's onto something here and it's worth looking into.

First, I think he's mislabeled it. It isn't an internal tell. In fact, it isn't a tell in anything like the classic sense of that term.

Tells are mannerisms or changes in demeanor or action that reveal information about the strength of your hand.

Tells are, hence the name, "telling" your opponents something that they can use to make more informed decisions. If you're in bankruptcy court it might make you feel less confident at the table but it won't necessarily have any outward effect on how you play K-8 off from the BB.

Silverstein notes that when he talked with professional players about this topic, in his words, they "initially had trouble relating to the idea."

And well they should.

Silverstein is really talking about tilt. If there's an 'internal tell' here it is one that is 'telling' the player that they are, indeed, tilting.

Phil Hellmuth
Next to tilt Hellmuth knows no foe.
 

Tilt is the poker player's most formidable foe. It's been talked about and written about endlessly but still eludes a full unpacking of its nature. Of all those who have broached the topic, Tommy Angelo has made the most progress.

I've recommended his book Elements of Poker before so let me do so again. Angelo would likely resonate to Silverstein's approach, though I suspect he too would rename it.

Why are "internal tells" simply tilt? Because they are internal states that screw with decision making. Sometimes they are cognitive in nature, like when you're depressed or tired and have trouble thinking through the complexities of a hand. Sometimes they are emotional in that business troubles (or a shrinking playing bankroll) are creating gut-churning levels of anxiety, which is known to undermine confidence.

Sometimes they are motivational like those days where you've lost the calm, determined approach to the game, feel twitchy and unsure.

Each of these unhappy states causes tilt because when you're angry or depressed, anxious or unsure, confused or overwhelmed, you cannot make optimal decisions. Non-optimal decision making is the functional equivalent of tilt.

I'm going through this in detail because there is an important point. Tilt isn't just flinging cards or going on some nutty raise-reraise rampage. Tilt isn't normally as obvious and compelling as cussing out an opponent.

Tilt is any time, any, when circumstances conspire so that you are no longer playing at your best.

That's it.

So, if it's that simple, why all the fuss? Well, just because it is that simple --- and just because simple truths oft carry complex lessons with them.

The lesson here? Let's go back to Silverstein, because he's actually got the issue right, even if he mislabeled it.

He counsels listening to your inner voice, learning to take note of your emotional state, searching for calm spaces, ones where you feel at one with yourself and are in the moment.

Jerry Yang
Un-tiltable.
 

He relates a conversation he had with Jerry Yang (yeah, I know, none of you think much of him as a player but, hell, he did win the big enchilada). Jerry tells him that he learned that he cannot play good poker when he has other serious matters on his mind.

He says that when "I am calm, not agitated, nothing outside the table distracts me ... I feel almost invincible."

Humberto Brenes (I think we can all agree that his game is pretty good) tells Silverstein that when he is in the zone "I don't even see my cards, I just become my cards." And when he gets smacked hard he puts a favorite song on his iPod and sings to himself until he calms down again.

The keys here are two-fold. First, you have to learn to detect these tilt-generating states. This isn't always easy.

I often find that I'm feeling tense or annoyed or lacking patience and, once I notice this, I ask myself, "When did this start? How long have I been like this? How many non-optimal decisions have I already made?"

I've been playing this game for decades and I'm still working on spotting these internal states. It ain't easy.

Second, you need to learn how to make the mental adjustments to bring you back from tiltiness.

Brenes sings (sometimes out loud!). Yang shuts out uncomfortable thoughts. Angelo meditates and uses controlled breathing (go read the book). Reber, well, Reber still hasn't figured it out but, hell, it ain't easy.

Comments

4

  1. Arty Smokes

    2011-06-18

    Nice article, but it seems a more concise way of putting it would be to say "To cure an emotional imbalance, you must first identify it, accept it, and then deal with it." With regard to poker, it's also true that it's better for you to realise you're exhibiting these "internal tells" before they become outward tells for your opponents. (It's funny how the rest of table can usually spot who's on tilt - and take advantage of it - before the player himself does!)
    I wonder if the most notable "victims" of meltdowns at the poker table have a kind of addiction to the "thrill" that tilt provides. That rush of blood to the head after having your aces cracked can provide a buzz somewhat akin to snorting certain pharmaceuticals. Perhaps Hellmuth or Matusow get some sort of masochistic pleasure from this rush. They make one bad decision, and then compound it by over-compensating for it straight away, thus extending the time that the buzz lasts.

    I like to think I'm pretty much in tune with how I feel at any particular moment, so I've learned to deal with tilt before it has a chance to engulf me. If I take a bad beat, I've found that instead of berating the world, I'll have a quiet word with myself. I'll say something like, "OK, that was a bad beat and you lost some chips, but don't go on tilt, or you'll lose your whole stack. Count to 10 slowly and muck the next few hands until you're back on an even keel. Recount that hand in the bar in a couple of hours' time, but not now. Get back to focussing on this game".
    If I just can't block out the bad stuff, then I usually have to leave the table for half an hour. I just hope it never happens when I'm on the bubble at a cash tournament!

  2. LittleStack

    2010-02-22

    I played against Jerry Yang at a cash game at the Venetian in November, and he is not un-tiltable ... when I won the second hand against him, knowing that he was bluffing, he said, in a pretty calm (but terse for him) tone ... "Oh, you're not a pro huh? You're not a pro!? You're winning every hand that you're in..." I reminded him that most of those hands (with the exception of his) weren't even making the river. Very nice guy, very sweet guy - but he's tiltable - no human being is un-tiltable.

    Peace,
    LittleStack

  3. Arthur Reber, Ph.D.

    2010-02-20

    Thanks so much for you comments, Bob. We are pretty much in accord on all the important points ---- which is too bad I guess because a good fight could be fun.

    My main point was, as you note, the shift in meaning of the word "tell." I'd still prefer to see it have the traditional, more narrow meaning but languages are living things and are always changing. If your new sense takes hold, that's fine.

    The other key idea was to focus on "tilt." Here again, the issue is semantic. I'm a big fan of Tommy Angelo's approach to poker. Tommy defines tilt as any situation where some factor (emotional, cognitive, social, hormonal ....) causes you to play less than your A-game. So, from this perspective, an 'internal tell' will often be a signal that you have or are still playing less than optimally -- in short, you were or are 'on tilt.'

    But we are certainly in agreement that it is critical to become aware of these internal states, to recognize them before the damage is done and to maintain emotional equilibrium.

    Ain't it cool when two psychologists actually agree!

    Thanks again for your input and thanks for "letting" me steal some of your ideas.

  4. Bob Silverstein

    2010-02-17

    http://pokerpromagazine.com/understanding-internal-tells.html
    http://pokerpromagazine.com/the-blame-game.html

    As the author of the article in question I'd like to make a few comments regarding Mr. Reber's thoughtful analysis. This article was actually the third in series on "internal tells" in Poker Pro magazine. Links to the first two are provided above. While there is no requirement for Mr. Reber to have read the first two, if he had I believe that his review would have been differently informed.

    First, "internal tells" are not the same as "tells". One difference is that they primarily tell the individual something about themselves. They are not about the information that an opponent gains from us or that we gain from an opponent. Internal tells are indicators (taking place inside of us) that a player can learn to read, so that they can better know their own state of mind and ability and make sound decisions. Yes, because a tell is commonly thought of as sign we give to our opponents, Mr. Reber is right that this is a hard shift for some to understand, but it is not a tell in the normal sense.

    Secondly, an internal tell is not the same as being on tilt. While we may be on tilt when we experience internal tells we may be off in much more subtle ways or we may not be off at all and in a very positive place. An internal tell is simply an indicator or sign of our state of mind in body. Internal tells show up in our emotions, physical body, thinking or behavior. They indicate both whether we are in a good clear state, a fully triggered or a mildly distorted condition. If one is experiencing an in-zone or positive internal tell then one can, for example, know that he can act with greater, rather than lesser assurance that he is making the right move.

    Mr. Reber's does note that the heart of my article is listening to our internal voice. Here, I couldn't agree more. Not only can listening to internal tells power our decision making and allow us to play our best poker, but it can provide the basis for our learning how to modify unhelpful/out-of-zone reactions. By doing so we can free ourselves from habitual reactions, feel better as we do so and get better results.



Leave Your Comment