ICM Calculators and Super Short-Stack Tournament Strategy
This week CardRunners coach Samer "Braminc" Khuri explains ICM calculators and how fully understanding them can help us with super short-stack poker tournament strategy.
Samer "Braminc" Khuri has been playing SNGs full time since 2006. He plays a wide range of stakes and his latest CardRunners video series, SNG Payout Analysis, explains how to effectively adjust to any tournament structure in the world. In his spare time he plays guitar, sings, and writes music.
Take it away Samer.
Most people that play poker tournaments are familiar with one very basic and crucial concept: When your stack reaches a certain critically low level, you must either go all-in or fold pre-flop.
Raising a standard amount becomes suboptimal, as you will end up having less fold equity yet still be committed to the pot after the flop (no matter what the flop is).
The idea is to maximize our fold equity while we have it to increase our chances of survival.
While this is widely accepted, there is some debate as to just how short stacked “critically low” is. Some players seem to only shove/fold when their stack reaches 15 big blinds or less. Some say 10 big blinds or less.
Some point out that you should calculate your M—your stack size divided by the total value of the blinds and antes—and shove whenever M is less than 10. None of these answers is exactly right or wrong. It depends on the tendencies of your opponents, how they view a pre-flop shove from you, and how they react to a standard raise from you.
10 big blinds and an M of 10 have always been key values for me. There are absolutely times when I will shove 15 or even 20 big blinds, and there are other times when I will make a standard raise with as few as 8 big blinds. Both of those scenarios are rare, and they are not what this article is about.
I want to discuss the shortest of short stacks: the times you have 5 big blinds or less (or an M of 5 or less).
In these situations, you are running out of fold equity. You need to move quickly. To play cautiously at this stage will lose you money in the long run.
Many of us use ICM calculators to determine what hands are +EV to shove in what spots (and what hands aren’t).
These ICM calculators are the key to short stack tournament poker. However, they have limitations.
ICM is a measurement of total prize pool equity. Using it, you can compare the value of your stack if you move in and if you fold.
The first problem we encounter is that your prize pool equity is based solely on the number of chips you have now relative to the total number of chips and players remaining. No account is taken of the players’ skill.
The calculator doesn’t know how good you are; even we humans don’t know exactly how good anyone is. So, if you are one of the best players at the table, ICM is likely to underestimate the value of your stack; this will affect the best play sometimes.
Another major limitation of ICM, and the most relevant one to this article, is that because these calculators simply compare your prize pool equity if you shove or fold immediately after the hand, they ignore future hands.
Another way to put this point is that the real value of your stack can depend on the position of the blinds, whether you are likely to be in very bad situations soon, and so on. I
n my view, when you are as short as 4 or 5 big blinds, you need to take shoves that ICM says are –EV, because folding is often even worse than ICM indicates.
The problem is that calculating just how bad our future situations will be can be extremely difficult. Nobody can figure this out with complete accuracy; it depends on all our opponents’ tendencies and is sensitive to very small changes in their stack sizes.
Usually we will not be dealt monster cards within the next orbit of play, and since our fold equity will disappear when we continue folding, we will be getting our chips all-in as huge underdogs a majority of the time.
After studying hundreds of short-stack tournament scenarios, I can confidently say that the degree to which we should be willing to take -EV shoves at 4-5 big blinds is much higher than I ever would have expected.
In a typical SNG, -1% to -2% of the prize pool is an extremely reasonable -EV shove to make under the gun when facing the alternative of blinding out of play. In larger tournaments the same is true, although the exact number will be different because of the greater field size.
If you are able to fully understand what ICM is, how it works, and what the ICM calculators are telling you, then you can apply good reasoning to learn when it is appropriate to deviate from their suggestions.
In this case, we have observed that ICM calculators are unaware that the tournament doesn’t end after the exact hand it is analyzing.
Because the tournament must continue, folding trashy cards with a stack of 4 or 5 big blinds can be pure suicide as you will soon have literally zero fold equity and close to zero prize pool equity.
We must do our best to estimate which -EV shoves are appropriate and which aren’t. The short answer is that almost all -EV shoves in the described situation are very appropriate and necessary.
Improve your poker game with CardRunners. CardRunners offers all the tools you need to learn poker, including new videos released daily, strategy forums, pro interviews and more.
Read More PokerListings/Cardrunners Strategy Articles:
- Live Poker Tournaments as Vacation Destinations
- Badugi Strategy! How to Beat Three Common Types of Players
- Beginner's Guide to Poker Tracking Software
- Key Differences Between US and Euro Online Poker Sites
- Swingo! The Best Home Game Variant You've Never Heard Of - Steve Albini
- Being Responsible with Your First Big Score - John "Nikolak" Kim
i'm gonna guess you've done worse with your time.
Where does it say it's an introductory article? Didn't seem to me they were trying to introduce us to ICM, more like looking at how ICM can be applied to ultra-shortstack tournament strategy.
Also, who doesn't know what ICM is? Also, have you heard of a thing called google?
So... an introductory article on an acronym, that doesn't explain what said acronm stands for. What a waste of time.